The Longer Ending of Mark
Last Sunday, we opened the Mark 16 "can of worms." Perhaps you've stumbled across this can of worms yourself when reading the last chapter of the book of Mark. After verse 8, you will find an editor's note like the picture above. The note in the ESV says, "Some of the earliest manuscripts do not include Mark 16:9-20"
In the sermon, we talked about two camps: 1) those who believe the longer version is not original to the text and 2) those who believe it is. The majority of scholars believe that what we have today was not originally in the text; however even within THAT camp, scholars are split. Some believe that the original text ended with the abrupt verse-8 ending: "And they went out and fled from the tomb, for trembling and astonishment had seized them, and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid."
Others in that camp say that the longer ending is not original but that it was added to replace the original longer ending that has been lost to time. Here is a video from Wes Huff where he argues that the longer ending of Mark is not original, but it has replaced a longer ending that has been lost to time: The Gospel of Mark is missing its ending? Let me explain...
As promised, here is a video from the first camp, those who believe the longer ending is legitimate. This is Dr. James Snapp, explaining why the longer ending IS original to the text: Defending Mark 16:9-20 From Misinformation w/James Snapp
Comments
Post a Comment